social.outsourcedmath.com

Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
Two wildly different responses to my original post:

First, we have Captain Obvious, declaring that what I said is so painfully self-evident it’s not even worth typing—because clearly, only people who unironically use LinkedIn believe in personal brands. And let’s face it, nobody actually uses LinkedIn unironically.

Then there’s the self-proclaimed entrepreneur who thinks “just be yourself” is the worst advice since New Coke. According to them, being authentic isn’t just naive—it’s downright cringe. Apparently, the only thing more ridiculous than trying to be real is expecting anyone to take advice that doesn’t sound like it came from the back of a Snapple cap.
RE: https://atomicpoet.org/objects/06790f81-68e4-4b75-8414-a98bf3ba2167

No, “personal brands” do not exist. Here’s why.

What even is a brand? Originally, it wasn’t about vibe curation or colour palettes – it was about searing hot iron and cow buttocks. In the Wild West, ranchers would take a metal rod, heat it to obscene levels, burn a symbol into their livestock, and voila – if your cow wandered off, you could go reclaim Bessie from your neighbour and tell them, “See that scar? She’s mine!”

A brand was literally proof of ownership. No mood board. No influencers. Just fire and regret.

Later, this barbaric act expanded beyond cattle. Breeders started branding their horses to show off their lineage. Bakers started stamping their buns, because why not ruin pastry with an ego mark? Then came packaging, jingles, and entire colour palettes to signal, “Hey, this bread’s ours!” But here’s the key: the owner applied the brand – it wasn’t the brand itself.

Now, for the uncomfortable part: branding didn’t stop at cows and bread. Slave owners, in all their maximum assholery, also branded humans. They burned their logos onto living skin to assert ownership in the most degrading way possible. So yeah, every time I see someone voluntarily tattooing a logo on their body, I shudder. Not because it’s edgy, but because, historically speaking, it’s… yikes.

And yet, somehow, you want to be a personal brand? Why?!

Let’s break this down. If you’re the brand, congratulations, you’ve rebranded… yourself. Otherwise known as your name. Hi, Bob. You’re Bob. You don’t need Helvetica Bold to prove it. And no, the DMV isn’t accepting your Instagram bio as valid ID soon.

Is your product the brand? That’s not personal – it’s transactional. People don’t buy Ralph Lauren because they feel spiritually connected to Ralph himself. If Ralph sold his company tomorrow, the shirts would stay the same, and no one would cry over his personal journey.

Or worse: is someone else branding you? That’s not branding – that’s dystopian nightmare territory. We have words to describe that, like exploitation and, you know, crime.

The truth is, this whole “personal brand” thing is a desperate attempt to be a walking billboard in a world that rewards soundbites over substance. But you’re not a logo. You’re not a vibe. And for heaven’s sake, you’re not a cow.

You’re a person. You’re allowed to have depth, contradictions, and zero interest in building a “cohesive aesthetic”. Stop trying to burn yourself into an archetype and just be human.

And hey, if someone doesn’t recognize your value without a “brand”, maybe they’re the one with the problem.

Avatar

stony kark

@aapis@mastodon.world
·
18m
Replying to @atomicpoet

@atomicpoet I agree, but this is really only new information for people who use LinkedIn unironically
Avatar

Chris Trottier

@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org
·
10m
Replying to @aapis

@aapis Well, that happens to be a lot of people. 🙂
Avatar

stony kark

@aapis@mastodon.world
·
6m
Replying to @atomicpoet

@atomicpoet nah I’ve seen LinkedIn, it’s gotta be a joke
Dec 20, 2024, 14:01
Avatar

Chris Trottier

@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org
·
1m
Replying to @aapis

@aapis Have you ever gotten to know some of those folk? I assure you they’re 100% sincere, and they say all of it unironically. 

They’re so sincere, they think you’re not real and are being insincere.
Redditor: Silly take — obviously a) the definitions of words evolve over time, "brand" means something different today than 100 years ago and b) people will always judge you for dumb bullshit so you might as well control the dumb bullshit they judge you for by "branding yourself". 

Me: You can't control the dumb bullshit. That's an illusion. 

Redditor: 

I mostly agree with you but you can control it a little bit

Me: 

The best control is to be a person instead of a personal brand.



Redditor: 

You're not a fortune cookie.


I wish bro but the world isn't a fortune cookie

Redditor:
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)

Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
No, “personal brands” do not exist. Here’s why.

What even is a brand? Originally, it wasn’t about vibe curation or colour palettes – it was about searing hot iron and cow buttocks. In the Wild West, ranchers would take a metal rod, heat it to obscene levels, burn a symbol into their livestock, and voila – if your cow wandered off, you could go reclaim Bessie from your neighbour and tell them, “See that scar? She’s mine!”

A brand was literally proof of ownership. No mood board. No influencers. Just fire and regret.

Later, this barbaric act expanded beyond cattle. Breeders started branding their horses to show off their lineage. Bakers started stamping their buns, because why not ruin pastry with an ego mark? Then came packaging, jingles, and entire colour palettes to signal, “Hey, this bread’s ours!” But here’s the key: the owner applied the brand – it wasn’t the brand itself.

Now, for the uncomfortable part: branding didn’t stop at cows and bread. Slave owners, in all their maximum assholery, also branded humans. They burned their logos onto living skin to assert ownership in the most degrading way possible. So yeah, every time I see someone voluntarily tattooing a logo on their body, I shudder. Not because it’s edgy, but because, historically speaking, it’s… yikes.

And yet, somehow, you want to be a personal brand? Why?!

Let’s break this down. If you’re the brand, congratulations, you’ve rebranded… yourself. Otherwise known as your name. Hi, Bob. You’re Bob. You don’t need Helvetica Bold to prove it. And no, the DMV isn’t accepting your Instagram bio as valid ID soon.

Is your product the brand? That’s not personal – it’s transactional. People don’t buy Ralph Lauren because they feel spiritually connected to Ralph himself. If Ralph sold his company tomorrow, the shirts would stay the same, and no one would cry over his personal journey.

Or worse: is someone else branding you? That’s not branding – that’s dystopian nightmare territory. We have words to describe that, like exploitation and, you know, crime.

The truth is, this whole “personal brand” thing is a desperate attempt to be a walking billboard in a world that rewards soundbites over substance. But you’re not a logo. You’re not a vibe. And for heaven’s sake, you’re not a cow.

You’re a person. You’re allowed to have depth, contradictions, and zero interest in building a “cohesive aesthetic”. Stop trying to burn yourself into an archetype and just be human.

And hey, if someone doesn’t recognize your value without a “brand”, maybe they’re the one with the problem.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
Ha ha. I put this post on r/Entrepreneur, and it’s massively downvoted.

Nope, self-identified entrepreneurs don’t like this message at all.

Nixon_37
•
11m ago
•

Silly take — obviously a) the definitions of words evolve over time, "brand" means something different today than 100 years ago and b) people will always judge you for dumb bullshit so you might as well control the dumb bullshit they judge you for by "branding yourself".

tiggerclaw 
Nixon_37
•
11m ago
•

Silly take — obviously a) the definitions of words evolve over time, "brand" means something different today than 100 years ago and b) people will always judge you for dumb bullshit so you might as well control the dumb bullshit they judge you for by "branding yourself".


Nixon_37
•
3m ago
•

I mostly agree with you but you can control it a little bit

tiggerclaw 
Nixon_37
•
3m ago
•

The best control is to be a person instead of a personal brand.
stony kark mastodon (AP)
I agree, but this is really only new information for people who use LinkedIn unironically
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@aapis Well, that happens to be a lot of people. 🙂
stony kark mastodon (AP)
nah I’ve seen LinkedIn, it’s gotta be a joke
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@aapis Have you ever gotten to know some of those folk? I assure you they’re 100% sincere, and they say all of it unironically.

They’re so sincere, they think you’re not real and are being insincere.
stony kark mastodon (AP)
why would you want to get to know a LinkedIn influencer
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@aapis I never get to know someone because they’re a LinkedIn influencer. I know them and then they become a LinkedIn influencer. You get what I’m saying here?
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@aapis All right, there’s this place beyond the Internet called Meatspace. It’s kind of like the Metaverse except you flail about with these fleshly things called limbs.

And you can do incredible activities there like taste and smell things. But also interact with real human beings while they move about their flesh-parts.

Anyway, in Meatspace, I’ve met a variety of people. Some of them can also be found on the Internet, quite often on social media platforms like Mastodon, Reddit, or LinkedIn. Sometimes they connect with me on those platforms too, and they’re exactly the same person on social media as they are on Meatspace.

It’s incredible!
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
LOL. I just re-posted this to r/marketing.
Ciarán McNally mastodon (AP)
As someone self employed consulting the last 9 years, I've always wondered where this idea came from.

I've got asked numerous times why I did XYZ when it could impact my personal brand, I still have no response to that other than... "What the fuck is wrong with you?"

If things I do unrelated to work, impact people's opinion of me or don't actively sell what I do to potential customers, welcome to existing in the real world. I also make purchasing decisions on these variables.
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@saxnot Let’s revisit what I said with the pertinent part bolded:
So yeah, every time I see someone voluntarily tattooing a logo on their body, I shudder.

I didn’t say getting a tattoo was “morally bad”, I said I’m uncomfortable when I see someone tattooing a company logo on their flesh.
saxnot mastodon (AP)
you said the act of tattooing reminds you of how slaves have been marked and thus morally bad…
Chris Trottier pleroma (AP)
@saxnot I never said tattoos are bad. You may want to re-read exactly what I wrote.

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.