social.outsourcedmath.com

comcreator lemmy (AP)
Brutal. It an option more distros need.
betterdeadthanreddit doesn't like this.
Ryan lemmy (AP)
Agree it sounds like a push for users to use snap more, but at the same time the "plan" doesn't sound bad in it's entirety - depending on how they design the installer experience. I could think of preselected profiles (like office, graphics, ...) that install an (adjustable) set of applications upon install. They could be downloaded on-demand while installing the system.
This entry was edited (12 months ago)
DestinyGrey lemmy (AP)
TL;DR for those who didn't read the article- it's going to basically offer users choices of programs to have pre-installed where they can basically customize their installation experience... but it's all going to be predicated on their useless snap store. In other words, as usual the best way to experience Ubuntu is via some third-party variant.
marswarrior lemmy (AP)
No serious user really chooses Ubuntu if they want a minimal install. Best options for that would be, arch, debian, alpine, or something like lubuntu.
marswarrior lemmy (AP)
ninite of ubuntu and any other distro is just sudo apt install package package package package .... replace package manager accordingly.

super easy, barely an invonvenience. - ryan george.
This entry was edited (12 months ago)
Nanook friendica (via ActivityPub)
My experience with snap has been nothing but bad, I absolutely hate it.
chimay friendica
they won't benefit from the red hat stuff by pushing snap.
Linux reshared this.

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.