For added fun, consider that they are charging him with terrorism. Per the New York statue, terrorism is one of these:

(i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) influence the policy of a unit of government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) affect the conduct of a unit of government by murder, assassination or kidnapping

Source: https://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article490.php#p490.5

He did none of those things. A private company is not the government, and he specifically targeted one person, not the civilian population. By charging terrorism, New York says that an insurance company is part of the government, a clear sign of corruption.

Yeah I don't see how the terrorism charge will stick.

I don’t see how the terrorism charge will stick.

Yet I won't be surprised when it does.

These days, the law is whatever the people in power want it to be.

I would hope that judges still judge.