-
@pluralistichttps://pluralistic.net/2024/12/20/clinical-trial-by-ordeal/Realistically, few people are going to read a 900-page group work of neofeudalist fanfic shit out by the most esoteric Fedsoc weirdos the world has ever seen.
But one person who did read Project 2025 was the leftist historian Rick Perlstein, who was the first person to really dig into what a fucking messthat thing is:
https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/14/fracture-lines/#disassembly-manualPerlstein's excellent analysis doesn't claim that Project 2025's authors aren't sincere in their intentions to wreak great harm upon the nation and its people;
rather, his point is that Project 2025 is filled with contradictory, mutually exclusive proposals written by people who fundamentally disagree with one another,
and who each have enough power within the Trump coalition that all of their proposals have to be included in a document like this:
https://prospect.org/politics/2024-07-10-project-2025-republican-presidencies-tradition/Project 2025 isn't just a guide to the masturbatory fantasies of the worst people in American politics
– far more importantly, it is a detailed map of the fracture lines in the GOP coalition, the places where it is liable to split and shatter.
🔥This is an important point if you want to do more about Trumpism than run around feeling miserable and scared.
If you want to fight, Project 2025 is a guide to the weak spots where an attack will do the most damage.
Perlstein's insight continues to be borne out as the Trump regime makes ready to take power.
In a new story for KFF News, Stephanie Armour and Julie Rovner describe the irreconcilable differences among Trump's picks for the country's top public health authorities:
https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/trump-rfk-kennedy-health-hhs-fda-cdc-vaccines-covid-weldon/The brain-worm-infected-elephant in the room is, of course, RFK Jr, who has been announced as Trump's head of Health and Human Services.
RFK Jr is a notorious antivaxer, chairman of Children’s Health Defense, a notorious anti-vaccine group.
Kennedy's view is shared by Trump's chosen CDC boss, Dave Weldon, a physician who has repeated the dangerous lie that vaccinations cause autism.
Mehmet "Dr Oz" Oz, the TV "physician" Trump wants to put in charge of Medicare/Medicaid, calls vaccines "oversold" and advocates for treating covid with hydroxychloroquine, another thoroughly debunked hoax:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2024/12/17/hydroxychloroquine-study-covid-19-retracted-trump/77051671007/However, other top Trump public health picks emphatically support vaccines.
#
Marty #
Makary is Trump's choice for FDA commissioner;
he's a Johns Hopkins trained surgeon who says vaccines "save lives" (but he peddles the lethal, unscientific hoax that childhood vaccines should be "spread out").
#
Jay #
Bhattacharya, the economist/MD whom Trump wants to put in charge of the NIH, supports vaccines
(he is also one of the country's leading proponents of the eugenicist idea of accepting the mass death of elderly, sick and disabled people rather than imposing quarantines during epidemics).
Then there's #
Janette #
Nesheiwat, whom Trump has asked to serve as the nation's surgeon general; she calls vaccines "a gift from God."
Like "Bidenism," Trumpism is a fragile coalition of people who thoroughly and irreconcilably disagree with one another.
During the Biden administration, this resulted in self-inflicted injuries like appointing the brilliant trustbuster Lina Khan to run the FTC,
but also appointing the pro-monopoly corporate lawyer Jacqueline Scott Corley to a lifetime seat as a federal judge,
from which perch she ruled against Khan's no-brainer suit to block the Microsoft-Activision merger:
https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/judge-rules-for-microsoft-mergersThe Trump coalition is even broader than the Biden coalition.
That's how he won the 2024 election.
But that also means that Trumpism is more fractious and off-balance, and hence will be easier to disrupt,
because it is riven by people in senior positions who hate one another and are actively working for each others' political demise.
Judge Jacqueline Corley penned a remarkably shoddy decision in the Microsoft-Activision case. We have a problem with bad and often random decisions by judges.
Matt Stoller (BIG by Matt Stoller)